Friday, September 7, 2012

Did you know? Mainstream Nutritionists Promote a Protein Myth (which can easily be deconstructed) - (VIDEO)

Did you know? (This one is brutal for people to realize, but too bad - for those that take offence, consider this, maybe you deserve it!).

Did you know that the argument given by mainstream nutritionists that we should eat meat for attaining protein leads logically to the fact that the best meat for us to eat is human? I know this makes you squirm, but it is the case that if we are told that we need to eat protein that was already constructed for attaining our own...protein... why not just eat the protein that has been constructed perfectly already for what we will need... other humans!


The reason why it is so outrageous that we are told to eat meat for our protein is that the human body builds its own human protein from the amino acids accessed from any quality uncooked source. All we need is amino acids... when we get them we don't have to consider the protein conversation any more. To say we need to eat animals to get protein is one of the most dangerous belief systems forced upon the masses possible. And if you want to produce human protein, why eat a cow when you can just eat a person and get the protein most similar to the one we will need to build. There sure is an abundance of dead humans, isn’t that what wars produce? Disgusting – dead Cows, Birds, Goats, Fish, Humans... all inferior ways for us to get our amino acid requirement.

Furthermore, look at the most common animals available for food in the market place and ask yourself what is their natural diet? Grass, grains, corn, soy - and they eat these foods and synthesize them into the protein needed to build the muscle (flesh) that some people then eat. So when you eat animal flesh it’s a second hand protein, because you have to break that meat back down into basic amino acids and then re-synthesize those amino acids back into a protein you can use. In the process of breaking down animal flesh all sorts of other nasty things are introduced into your bloodstream. So many in fact that in order to prevent viral and bacterial agents from entering the human bodies of those who consume meat, the FDA released an estimated 29 million lbs of antimicrobial drugs to be sold or distributed for use in food-producing animals, and this was in 2009 alone. Also, most commercial “food” animals consume large quantities of grain, grass, etc., which are to a greater or lesser extent contaminated with herbicides, pesticides, and other agents. These poisons concentrate in the fat of the animal and are present in highly concentrated amounts in an animal's milk and flesh.

Isn’t it ironic that the chief argument used to promote the use of animal products (that is, the purported need for large quantities of protein) is the greatest reason for avoiding them?


No comments: